🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence comparable debates in additional member states